Rocksolid Light - rocksolid.shared.freenet - Re: Freenet Rocksolid Interface

Subject: Re: Freenet Rocksolid Interface
From: Retro Guy
Newsgroups: rocksolid.shared.freenet
Organization: RetroBBS
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2019 01:13 UTC
References: 1

Path: i2pn2.org!news.novabbs.com!.POSTED.rocksolidbbs!not-for-mail
From: retro.guy@retrobbs.rocksolidbbs.com.remove-uvs-this (Retro Guy)
Newsgroups: rocksolid.shared.freenet
Subject: Re: Freenet Rocksolid Interface
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 18:13:29 -0700
Organization: RetroBBS
Message-ID: <20190111181329.383034d3@desktop14.dt>
References: <2797c5c8e0b7d5d04465f7c579f6456e@def4.i2p><q1b7af$ho3$1@def3.retrobbs.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: novabbs.com; posting-account="retroadmin"; posting-host="rocksolidbbs:192.241.178.238";
logging-data="29665"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@novabbs.com"
To: All
X-Comment-To: All
In-Reply-To: <2797c5c8e0b7d5d04465f7c579f6456e@def4.i2p><q1b7af$ho3$1@def3.retrobbs.com>
X-FTN-PID: Synchronet 3.17a-Linux Dec 29 2018 GCC 6.3.0
X-FTN-MSGID: 67.rs.freenet@88:1/100 209e757d
X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
X-Gateway: retrobbs.rocksolidbbs.com [Synchronet 3.17a-Linux NewsLink 1.110]

View all headers

On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 18:02:43 -0500
"trw" <trw@i2pmail.org> wrote:

btw, if you put rs on freenet, i hope your captcha is working well...
Posted on: def3.i2p

If I do put it on Freenet, it will be through a FMS interface of some
sort. Spamming using FMS is harder on the spammer than the reader of
the spam, lol!
--- Synchronet 3.17a-Linux NewsLink 1.110
* RetroBBS - Phoenix, AZ - telnet://retrobbs.rocksolidbbs.com

Subject: Re: Freenet Rocksolid Interface
From: Retro Guy
Newsgroups: rocksolid.shared.freenet
Organization: Rocksolid 2 (clearnet node)
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2019 12:41 UTC
References: 1

Path: i2pn2.org!rocksolid2!.POSTED.rocksolid3!not-for-mail
From: retro.guy@88:1/101.remove-brx-this (Retro Guy)
Newsgroups: rocksolid.shared.freenet
Subject: Re: Freenet Rocksolid Interface
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2019 12:41:28 +0000
Organization: Rocksolid 2 (clearnet node)
Message-ID: <5C3B3525.68.rs.freenet@retrobbs.rocksolidbbs.com>
References: <20190111181329.383034d3@desktop14.dt>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=IBM437
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: novabbs.com; posting-account="retroadmin"; posting-host="rocksolid3:192.241.178.238";
logging-data="26221"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@novabbs.com"
To: Retro Guy
X-Comment-To: Retro Guy
In-Reply-To: <20190111181329.383034d3@desktop14.dt>
X-FTN-AREA: ROCKSOLID.SHARED.FREENET
X-FTN-TID: Mystic BBS 1.12 A41
X-FTN-MSGID: 88:1/101 dc5e1350
X-FTN-REPLY: 67.rs.freenet@88:1/100 209e757d
X-FTN-SEEN-BY: 1/100 101
X-FTN-PATH: 1/101
X-Gateway: retrobbs.rocksolidbbs.com [Synchronet 3.17a-Linux NewsLink 1.110]

View all headers

To: Retro Guy
On 11 Jan 2019, Retro Guy said the following...

RG> On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 18:02:43 -0500
RG> "trw" <trw@i2pmail.org> wrote:
RG>
RG> > btw, if you put rs on freenet, i hope your captcha is working well...
RG> > Posted on: def3.i2p
RG>
RG> If I do put it on Freenet, it will be through a FMS interface of some
RG> sort. Spamming using FMS is harder on the spammer than the reader of
RG> the spam, lol!

The biggest issue tying rocksolid into an FMS interface on Freenet is
avoiding duplicate display of messages on the non Freenet end.

I'm working on some scripts to toss messages to FMS, convert all user names
to Anon when sending to Freenet (if I don't do that most messages won't show
up), then pulling back only what isn't already in the message base on this
end (so only Freenet users).

I am actively working on this, but it'll be some time before it's ready for
testing. I'd like it to work properly from the start. Just takes a lot of
header reading and modification, which isn't hard, but time consuming to
write properly (for me).

Retro Guy

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A41 2018/12/27 (Linux/64)
* Origin: NovaBBS - novabbs.org (88:1/101)
--- Synchronet 3.17a-Linux NewsLink 1.110

In most instances, all an argument proves is that two people are present.

rocksolid / Freenet / Re: Freenet Rocksolid Interface

Subject	Author
Re: Freenet Rocksolid Interface	Retro Guy
Re: Freenet Rocksolid Interface	Retro Guy