https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/03/19/heluva-scotus-choice-there-joe/

Heluva SCOTUS Choice There, Joe!
MARCH 19, 2024 / JACK MARSHALL

Great. We now have a U.S. Supreme Court Justice who doesn’t like the
First Amendment. The Babylon Bee hardly had to be satirical to come up
with that headline. During yesterday’s oral arguments before the U.S.
Supreme Court in Murthy v. Missouri, the newest Justice and the only one
appointed by President Biden, Kentanji Brown Jackson revealed a
frightening hostility to the most important guaranteed principle of
American freedom from oppressive government.

“My biggest concern is that your view has the First Amendment
hamstringing the government in significant ways in the most important
time periods,” Jackson told Louisiana Solicitor General Benjamin
Aguiñaga as he argued against allowing Big Brother to recruit Big Tech
as a political ally by intimidating social media platforms into removing
posts the government finds inconvenient. I read Jackson’s quotes
yesterday with genuine horror. My sister, a federal litigator of liberal
tendencies, had assured me that Jackson was a smart, solid, trustworthy
jurist based on her experiences appearing before her. Justice Jackson
may be smart, but trustworthy she isn’t. Intentionally or accidentally,
President Biden’s openly DEI appointment to fill the Court slot vacated
by Stephen Breyer installed the perfect tool to assist aspiring Democrat
totalitarians to achieve their agendas.

Oh please, tell us again how Donald Trump is the existential threat to
democracy.

“Hamstringing the government” is the entire principle underlying the
First Amendment, indeed the entire Bill of Rights. Jackson’ lament
demonstrates the socking devolution of the American Left. On the
celebrated, ultra-liberal Warren Court that brought us school
integration, the rights have a lawyer appointed and “the fruit of the
poisonous tree” among other advances in civil rights, liberal icon
William O. Douglas and fellow Democrat Hugo Black kept reminding the
public and the government that “Congress shall make no law abridging the
freedom of speech” means that Congress shall make no law abridging the
freedom of speech, and that in the Bill of Rights, Constitution
prohibitions on “Congress” are prohibitions on the government as a
whole. In those golden days, it was the evil conservatives trying to
tell people what they were allowed to see, read and hear.

Jackson’s statement about the perils of hamstringing the government were
just the beginning of her cheerleading for government censorship. “Some
might say that the government actually has a duty to take steps to
protect the citizens of this country” she said, making it obvious that
she was one of the ‘some.” “You seem to be suggesting that that duty
cannot manifest itself in the government encouraging or even pressuring
platforms to take down harmful information,” continued Jackson. “So can
you help me? Because I’m really worried about that. Because you’ve got
the First Amendment operating in an environment of threatening
circumstances, from the government’s perspective, and you’re saying that
the government can’t interact with the source of those problems.”

Ah, yes, those “threatening circumstances.” Can’t have that. You know,
like telling the public about the President’s son’s laptop, questioning
the edicts of the CDC during the pandemic and the suspicious undermining
of election integrity …or endangering Democratic power in Washington, D.C.

Despite indisputable proof that the Department of Health and Human
Services, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention, Census Bureau, Department of
Homeland Security, Department of State, FBI, Department of Justice, and
the White House demanded Big Tech companies like Twitter (now X),
Facebook, and YouTube interfere with Americans attempting to publicize
facts and opinions the government preferred to keep buried, Jackson
appeared to see this as completely benign.

Judge Terry Doughty, chief judge of the U.S. District Court for the
Western District of Louisiana in his 155-page ruling described the Biden
administration’s efforts to push social media platforms into doing its
censorship “the most massive attack against free speech in United
States’ history.” But Joe’s justice doesn’t see it that way at all. In
another exchange, Jackson argued that a “once-in-a-lifetime pandemic” or
other declared “emergencies” should allow the always well-meaning
government expand constitutional limits. You know, like Woodrow Wilson
locking up dissenters during World War I. Biden already has tried to use
his “emergency powers” illicitly, like ordering landlords not to evict
deadbeat tenants, or allowing degree holders to skip their obligations
to pay back loans. Most dictators take over in “emergencies,” and the
freedom of speech is usually the first right to go.

“I’m interested in your view that the context doesn’t change the First
Amendment principles,” Jackson said. “I understood our First Amendment
jurisprudence to require heightened scrutiny of government restrictions
of speech, but not necessarily a total prohibition when you’re talking
about a compelling interest of the government to ensure, for example,
that the public has accurate information in the context of a
once-in-a-lifetime pandemic.”

She actually said that, even though it is now undeniable that the public
was given false, deliberately misleading and repeatedly wrong
information by the government (as well as the fearmongering news media).
Conservative writer Matt Margolis correctly observed this morning, “More
often than not, it seems that the speech that the government censored or
suppressed turned out to be right in the end.”

Naturally, the mainstream media is soft-peddling Justice Jackson’s
ominous unmasking as a government censorship advocate. But the public
needs to understand: she stands for and with the party and the President
that are claiming only they can “save democracy,” when it is becoming
increasingly clear that the exact opposite is the truth.

______________

Source: The Federalist.

(Heluva) 03/19/24 Again ever more cursed by GOD ...

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/euYDQU1X4Fo/m/C4REuDM-AAAJ

Michael Ejercito wrote:

>https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/03/19/heluva-scotus-choice-there-joe/
>
>Heluva SCOTUS Choice There, Joe!
>MARCH 19, 2024 / JACK MARSHALL
>
>
>Great. We now have a U.S. Supreme Court Justice who doesn’t like the
>First Amendment. The Babylon Bee hardly had to be satirical to come up
>with that headline. During yesterday’s oral arguments before the U.S.
>Supreme Court in Murthy v. Missouri, the newest Justice and the only one
>appointed by President Biden, Kentanji Brown Jackson revealed a
>frightening hostility to the most important guaranteed principle of
>American freedom from oppressive government.
>
>“My biggest concern is that your view has the First Amendment
>hamstringing the government in significant ways in the most important
>time periods,” Jackson told Louisiana Solicitor General Benjamin
>Aguiñaga as he argued against allowing Big Brother to recruit Big Tech
>as a political ally by intimidating social media platforms into removing
>posts the government finds inconvenient. I read Jackson’s quotes
>yesterday with genuine horror. My sister, a federal litigator of liberal
>tendencies, had assured me that Jackson was a smart, solid, trustworthy
>jurist based on her experiences appearing before her. Justice Jackson
>may be smart, but trustworthy she isn’t. Intentionally or accidentally,
>President Biden’s openly DEI appointment to fill the Court slot vacated
>by Stephen Breyer installed the perfect tool to assist aspiring Democrat
>totalitarians to achieve their agendas.
>
>Oh please, tell us again how Donald Trump is the existential threat to
>democracy.
>
>
>“Hamstringing the government” is the entire principle underlying the
>First Amendment, indeed the entire Bill of Rights. Jackson’ lament
>demonstrates the socking devolution of the American Left. On the
>celebrated, ultra-liberal Warren Court that brought us school
>integration, the rights have a lawyer appointed and “the fruit of the
>poisonous tree” among other advances in civil rights, liberal icon
>William O. Douglas and fellow Democrat Hugo Black kept reminding the
>public and the government that “Congress shall make no law abridging the
>freedom of speech” means that Congress shall make no law abridging the
>freedom of speech, and that in the Bill of Rights, Constitution
>prohibitions on “Congress” are prohibitions on the government as a
>whole. In those golden days, it was the evil conservatives trying to
>tell people what they were allowed to see, read and hear.
>
>Jackson’s statement about the perils of hamstringing the government were
>just the beginning of her cheerleading for government censorship. “Some
>might say that the government actually has a duty to take steps to
>protect the citizens of this country” she said, making it obvious that
>she was one of the ‘some.” “You seem to be suggesting that that duty
>cannot manifest itself in the government encouraging or even pressuring
>platforms to take down harmful information,” continued Jackson. “So can
>you help me? Because I’m really worried about that. Because you’ve got
>the First Amendment operating in an environment of threatening
>circumstances, from the government’s perspective, and you’re saying that
>the government can’t interact with the source of those problems.”
>
>Ah, yes, those “threatening circumstances.” Can’t have that. You know,
>like telling the public about the President’s son’s laptop, questioning
>the edicts of the CDC during the pandemic and the suspicious undermining
>of election integrity …or endangering Democratic power in Washington, D.C.
>
>Despite indisputable proof that the Department of Health and Human
>Services, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Centers
>for Disease Control and Prevention, Census Bureau, Department of
>Homeland Security, Department of State, FBI, Department of Justice, and
>the White House demanded Big Tech companies like Twitter (now X),
>Facebook, and YouTube interfere with Americans attempting to publicize
>facts and opinions the government preferred to keep buried, Jackson
>appeared to see this as completely benign.
>
>Judge Terry Doughty, chief judge of the U.S. District Court for the
>Western District of Louisiana in his 155-page ruling described the Biden
>administration’s efforts to push social media platforms into doing its
>censorship “the most massive attack against free speech in United
>States’ history.” But Joe’s justice doesn’t see it that way at all. In
>another exchange, Jackson argued that a “once-in-a-lifetime pandemic” or
>other declared “emergencies” should allow the always well-meaning
>government expand constitutional limits. You know, like Woodrow Wilson
>locking up dissenters during World War I. Biden already has tried to use
>his “emergency powers” illicitly, like ordering landlords not to evict
>deadbeat tenants, or allowing degree holders to skip their obligations
>to pay back loans. Most dictators take over in “emergencies,” and the
>freedom of speech is usually the first right to go.
>
>“I’m interested in your view that the context doesn’t change the First
>Amendment principles,” Jackson said. “I understood our First Amendment
>jurisprudence to require heightened scrutiny of government restrictions
>of speech, but not necessarily a total prohibition when you’re talking
>about a compelling interest of the government to ensure, for example,
>that the public has accurate information in the context of a
>once-in-a-lifetime pandemic.”
>
>She actually said that, even though it is now undeniable that the public
>was given false, deliberately misleading and repeatedly wrong
>information by the government (as well as the fearmongering news media).
>Conservative writer Matt Margolis correctly observed this morning, “More
>often than not, it seems that the speech that the government censored or
>suppressed turned out to be right in the end.”
>
>Naturally, the mainstream media is soft-peddling Justice Jackson’s
>ominous unmasking as a government censorship advocate. But the public
>needs to understand: she stands for and with the party and the President
>that are claiming only they can “save democracy,” when it is becoming
>increasingly clear that the exact opposite is the truth.

In the interim, we are 100% prepared/protected in the "full armor of
GOD" (Ephesians 6:11) which we put on as soon as we use Apostle Paul's
secret (Philippians 4:12). Though masking is less protective, it helps
us avoid the appearance of doing the evil of spreading airborne
pathogens while there are people getting sick because of not being
100% protected. It is written that we're to "abstain from **all**
appearance of doing evil" (1 Thessalonians 5:22 w/**emphasis**).

Meanwhile, the only *perfect* (Matt 5:47-8 ) way to eradicate the
COVID-19 virus, thereby saving lives, in the UK & elsewhere is by
rapidly (i.e. use the "Rapid COVID-19 Test" ) finding out at any given
moment, including even while on-line, who among us are unwittingly
contagious (i.e pre-symptomatic or asymptomatic) in order to
"convince it forward" (John 15:12) for them to call their doctor and
self-quarantine per their doctor in hopes of stopping this pandemic.
Thus, we're hoping for the best while preparing for the worse-case
scenario of the Alpha lineage mutations and others like the Omicron,
Gamma, Beta, Epsilon, Iota, Lambda, Mu & Delta lineage mutations
combining via slip-RNA-replication to form hybrids like "Deltamicron"
that may render current COVID vaccines/monoclonals/medicines/pills no
longer effective.

Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry (
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/6ZoE95d-VKc/m/14vVZoyOBgAJ
) and hope you, Michael, also have a healthy appetite too.

So how are you ?

(Ketanji) 03/19/24 AgainX2 ever more cursed by GOD ...

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/euYDQU1X4Fo/m/C4REuDM-AAAJ

HeartDoc Andrew wrote:
> Michael Ejercito wrote:
>
>> https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/03/19/heluva-scotus-choice-there-joe/
>>
>> Heluva SCOTUS Choice There, Joe!
>> MARCH 19, 2024 / JACK MARSHALL
>>
>>
>> Great. We now have a U.S. Supreme Court Justice who doesn’t like the
>> First Amendment. The Babylon Bee hardly had to be satirical to come up
>> with that headline. During yesterday’s oral arguments before the U.S.
>> Supreme Court in Murthy v. Missouri, the newest Justice and the only one
>> appointed by President Biden, Kentanji Brown Jackson revealed a
>> frightening hostility to the most important guaranteed principle of
>> American freedom from oppressive government.
>>
>> “My biggest concern is that your view has the First Amendment
>> hamstringing the government in significant ways in the most important
>> time periods,” Jackson told Louisiana Solicitor General Benjamin
>> Aguiñaga as he argued against allowing Big Brother to recruit Big Tech
>> as a political ally by intimidating social media platforms into removing
>> posts the government finds inconvenient. I read Jackson’s quotes
>> yesterday with genuine horror. My sister, a federal litigator of liberal
>> tendencies, had assured me that Jackson was a smart, solid, trustworthy
>> jurist based on her experiences appearing before her. Justice Jackson
>> may be smart, but trustworthy she isn’t. Intentionally or accidentally,
>> President Biden’s openly DEI appointment to fill the Court slot vacated
>> by Stephen Breyer installed the perfect tool to assist aspiring Democrat
>> totalitarians to achieve their agendas.
>>
>> Oh please, tell us again how Donald Trump is the existential threat to
>> democracy.
>>
>>
>> “Hamstringing the government” is the entire principle underlying the
>> First Amendment, indeed the entire Bill of Rights. Jackson’ lament
>> demonstrates the socking devolution of the American Left. On the
>> celebrated, ultra-liberal Warren Court that brought us school
>> integration, the rights have a lawyer appointed and “the fruit of the
>> poisonous tree” among other advances in civil rights, liberal icon
>> William O. Douglas and fellow Democrat Hugo Black kept reminding the
>> public and the government that “Congress shall make no law abridging the
>> freedom of speech” means that Congress shall make no law abridging the
>> freedom of speech, and that in the Bill of Rights, Constitution
>> prohibitions on “Congress” are prohibitions on the government as a
>> whole. In those golden days, it was the evil conservatives trying to
>> tell people what they were allowed to see, read and hear.
>>
>> Jackson’s statement about the perils of hamstringing the government were
>> just the beginning of her cheerleading for government censorship. “Some
>> might say that the government actually has a duty to take steps to
>> protect the citizens of this country” she said, making it obvious that
>> she was one of the ‘some.” “You seem to be suggesting that that duty
>> cannot manifest itself in the government encouraging or even pressuring
>> platforms to take down harmful information,” continued Jackson. “So can
>> you help me? Because I’m really worried about that. Because you’ve got
>> the First Amendment operating in an environment of threatening
>> circumstances, from the government’s perspective, and you’re saying that
>> the government can’t interact with the source of those problems.”
>>
>> Ah, yes, those “threatening circumstances.” Can’t have that. You know,
>> like telling the public about the President’s son’s laptop, questioning
>> the edicts of the CDC during the pandemic and the suspicious undermining
>> of election integrity …or endangering Democratic power in Washington, D.C.
>>
>> Despite indisputable proof that the Department of Health and Human
>> Services, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Centers
>> for Disease Control and Prevention, Census Bureau, Department of
>> Homeland Security, Department of State, FBI, Department of Justice, and
>> the White House demanded Big Tech companies like Twitter (now X),
>> Facebook, and YouTube interfere with Americans attempting to publicize
>> facts and opinions the government preferred to keep buried, Jackson
>> appeared to see this as completely benign.
>>
>> Judge Terry Doughty, chief judge of the U.S. District Court for the
>> Western District of Louisiana in his 155-page ruling described the Biden
>> administration’s efforts to push social media platforms into doing its
>> censorship “the most massive attack against free speech in United
>> States’ history.” But Joe’s justice doesn’t see it that way at all. In
>> another exchange, Jackson argued that a “once-in-a-lifetime pandemic” or
>> other declared “emergencies” should allow the always well-meaning
>> government expand constitutional limits. You know, like Woodrow Wilson
>> locking up dissenters during World War I. Biden already has tried to use
>> his “emergency powers” illicitly, like ordering landlords not to evict
>> deadbeat tenants, or allowing degree holders to skip their obligations
>> to pay back loans. Most dictators take over in “emergencies,” and the
>> freedom of speech is usually the first right to go.
>>
>> “I’m interested in your view that the context doesn’t change the First
>> Amendment principles,” Jackson said. “I understood our First Amendment
>> jurisprudence to require heightened scrutiny of government restrictions
>> of speech, but not necessarily a total prohibition when you’re talking
>> about a compelling interest of the government to ensure, for example,
>> that the public has accurate information in the context of a
>> once-in-a-lifetime pandemic.”
>>
>> She actually said that, even though it is now undeniable that the public
>> was given false, deliberately misleading and repeatedly wrong
>> information by the government (as well as the fearmongering news media).
>> Conservative writer Matt Margolis correctly observed this morning, “More
>> often than not, it seems that the speech that the government censored or
>> suppressed turned out to be right in the end.”
>>
>> Naturally, the mainstream media is soft-peddling Justice Jackson’s
>> ominous unmasking as a government censorship advocate. But the public
>> needs to understand: she stands for and with the party and the President
>> that are claiming only they can “save democracy,” when it is becoming
>> increasingly clear that the exact opposite is the truth.
>
> In the interim, we are 100% prepared/protected in the "full armor of
> GOD" (Ephesians 6:11) which we put on as soon as we use Apostle Paul's
> secret (Philippians 4:12). Though masking is less protective, it helps
> us avoid the appearance of doing the evil of spreading airborne
> pathogens while there are people getting sick because of not being
> 100% protected. It is written that we're to "abstain from **all**
> appearance of doing evil" (1 Thessalonians 5:22 w/**emphasis**).
>
> Meanwhile, the only *perfect* (Matt 5:47-8 ) way to eradicate the
> COVID-19 virus, thereby saving lives, in the UK & elsewhere is by
> rapidly (i.e. use the "Rapid COVID-19 Test" ) finding out at any given
> moment, including even while on-line, who among us are unwittingly
> contagious (i.e pre-symptomatic or asymptomatic) in order to
> "convince it forward" (John 15:12) for them to call their doctor and
> self-quarantine per their doctor in hopes of stopping this pandemic.
> Thus, we're hoping for the best while preparing for the worse-case
> scenario of the Alpha lineage mutations and others like the Omicron,
> Gamma, Beta, Epsilon, Iota, Lambda, Mu & Delta lineage mutations
> combining via slip-RNA-replication to form hybrids like "Deltamicron"
> that may render current COVID vaccines/monoclonals/medicines/pills no
> longer effective.
>
> Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry (
> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/6ZoE95d-VKc/m/14vVZoyOBgAJ
> ) and hope you, Michael, also have a healthy appetite too.
>
> So how are you ?
>
I am wonderfully hungry!

Michael

Michael Ejercito wrote:
> HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> Michael Ejercito wrote:
>>
>>> https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/03/19/heluva-scotus-choice-there-joe/
>>>
>>> Heluva SCOTUS Choice There, Joe!
>>> MARCH 19, 2024 / JACK MARSHALL
>>>
>>>
>>> Great. We now have a U.S. Supreme Court Justice who doesn’t like the
>>> First Amendment. The Babylon Bee hardly had to be satirical to come up
>>> with that headline. During yesterday’s oral arguments before the U.S.
>>> Supreme Court in Murthy v. Missouri, the newest Justice and the only one
>>> appointed by President Biden, Kentanji Brown Jackson revealed a
>>> frightening hostility to the most important guaranteed principle of
>>> American freedom from oppressive government.
>>>
>>> “My biggest concern is that your view has the First Amendment
>>> hamstringing the government in significant ways in the most important
>>> time periods,” Jackson told Louisiana Solicitor General Benjamin
>>> Aguiñaga as he argued against allowing Big Brother to recruit Big Tech
>>> as a political ally by intimidating social media platforms into removing
>>> posts the government finds inconvenient. I read Jackson’s quotes
>>> yesterday with genuine horror. My sister, a federal litigator of liberal
>>> tendencies, had assured me that Jackson was a smart, solid, trustworthy
>>> jurist based on her experiences appearing before her. Justice Jackson
>>> may be smart, but trustworthy she isn’t. Intentionally or accidentally,
>>> President Biden’s openly DEI appointment to fill the Court slot vacated
>>> by Stephen Breyer installed the perfect tool to assist aspiring Democrat
>>> totalitarians to achieve their agendas.
>>>
>>> Oh please, tell us again how Donald Trump is the existential threat to
>>> democracy.
>>>
>>>
>>> “Hamstringing the government” is the entire principle underlying the
>>> First Amendment, indeed the entire Bill of Rights. Jackson’ lament
>>> demonstrates the socking devolution of the American Left. On the
>>> celebrated, ultra-liberal Warren Court that brought us school
>>> integration, the rights have a lawyer appointed and “the fruit of the
>>> poisonous tree” among other advances in civil rights, liberal icon
>>> William O. Douglas and fellow Democrat Hugo Black kept reminding the
>>> public and the government that “Congress shall make no law abridging the
>>> freedom of speech” means that Congress shall make no law abridging the
>>> freedom of speech, and that in the Bill of Rights, Constitution
>>> prohibitions on “Congress” are prohibitions on the government as a
>>> whole. In those golden days, it was the evil conservatives trying to
>>> tell people what they were allowed to see, read and hear.
>>>
>>> Jackson’s statement about the perils of hamstringing the government were
>>> just the beginning of her cheerleading for government censorship. “Some
>>> might say that the government actually has a duty to take steps to
>>> protect the citizens of this country” she said, making it obvious that
>>> she was one of the ‘some.” “You seem to be suggesting that that duty
>>> cannot manifest itself in the government encouraging or even pressuring
>>> platforms to take down harmful information,” continued Jackson. “So can
>>> you help me? Because I’m really worried about that. Because you’ve got
>>> the First Amendment operating in an environment of threatening
>>> circumstances, from the government’s perspective, and you’re saying that
>>> the government can’t interact with the source of those problems.”
>>>
>>> Ah, yes, those “threatening circumstances.” Can’t have that. You know,
>>> like telling the public about the President’s son’s laptop, questioning
>>> the edicts of the CDC during the pandemic and the suspicious undermining
>>> of election integrity …or endangering Democratic power in Washington, D.C.
>>>
>>> Despite indisputable proof that the Department of Health and Human
>>> Services, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Centers
>>> for Disease Control and Prevention, Census Bureau, Department of
>>> Homeland Security, Department of State, FBI, Department of Justice, and
>>> the White House demanded Big Tech companies like Twitter (now X),
>>> Facebook, and YouTube interfere with Americans attempting to publicize
>>> facts and opinions the government preferred to keep buried, Jackson
>>> appeared to see this as completely benign.
>>>
>>> Judge Terry Doughty, chief judge of the U.S. District Court for the
>>> Western District of Louisiana in his 155-page ruling described the Biden
>>> administration’s efforts to push social media platforms into doing its
>>> censorship “the most massive attack against free speech in United
>>> States’ history.” But Joe’s justice doesn’t see it that way at all. In
>>> another exchange, Jackson argued that a “once-in-a-lifetime pandemic” or
>>> other declared “emergencies” should allow the always well-meaning
>>> government expand constitutional limits. You know, like Woodrow Wilson
>>> locking up dissenters during World War I. Biden already has tried to use
>>> his “emergency powers” illicitly, like ordering landlords not to evict
>>> deadbeat tenants, or allowing degree holders to skip their obligations
>>> to pay back loans. Most dictators take over in “emergencies,” and the
>>> freedom of speech is usually the first right to go.
>>>
>>> “I’m interested in your view that the context doesn’t change the First
>>> Amendment principles,” Jackson said. “I understood our First Amendment
>>> jurisprudence to require heightened scrutiny of government restrictions
>>> of speech, but not necessarily a total prohibition when you’re talking
>>> about a compelling interest of the government to ensure, for example,
>>> that the public has accurate information in the context of a
>>> once-in-a-lifetime pandemic.”
>>>
>>> She actually said that, even though it is now undeniable that the public
>>> was given false, deliberately misleading and repeatedly wrong
>>> information by the government (as well as the fearmongering news media).
>>> Conservative writer Matt Margolis correctly observed this morning, “More
>>> often than not, it seems that the speech that the government censored or
>>> suppressed turned out to be right in the end.”
>>>
>>> Naturally, the mainstream media is soft-peddling Justice Jackson’s
>>> ominous unmasking as a government censorship advocate. But the public
>>> needs to understand: she stands for and with the party and the President
>>> that are claiming only they can “save democracy,” when it is becoming
>>> increasingly clear that the exact opposite is the truth.
>>
>> In the interim, we are 100% prepared/protected in the "full armor of
>> GOD" (Ephesians 6:11) which we put on as soon as we use Apostle Paul's
>> secret (Philippians 4:12). Though masking is less protective, it helps
>> us avoid the appearance of doing the evil of spreading airborne
>> pathogens while there are people getting sick because of not being
>> 100% protected. It is written that we're to "abstain from **all**
>> appearance of doing evil" (1 Thessalonians 5:22 w/**emphasis**).
>>
>> Meanwhile, the only *perfect* (Matt 5:47-8 ) way to eradicate the
>> COVID-19 virus, thereby saving lives, in the UK & elsewhere is by
>> rapidly (i.e. use the "Rapid COVID-19 Test" ) finding out at any given
>> moment, including even while on-line, who among us are unwittingly
>> contagious (i.e pre-symptomatic or asymptomatic) in order to
>> "convince it forward" (John 15:12) for them to call their doctor and
>> self-quarantine per their doctor in hopes of stopping this pandemic.
>> Thus, we're hoping for the best while preparing for the worse-case
>> scenario of the Alpha lineage mutations and others like the Omicron,
>> Gamma, Beta, Epsilon, Iota, Lambda, Mu & Delta lineage mutations
>> combining via slip-RNA-replication to form hybrids like "Deltamicron"
>> that may render current COVID vaccines/monoclonals/medicines/pills no
>> longer effective.
>>
>> Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry (
>> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/6ZoE95d-VKc/m/14vVZoyOBgAJ
>> ) and hope you, Michael, also have a healthy appetite too.
>>
>> So how are you ?
>
> I am wonderfully hungry!

Quack Andrew B. Chung = SHEIN = Anita = jew paedophile BARRY 'jewface'
SHEINabout 6 hours ago
ReplyPermalink
> On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 15:41:48 -0400, HeartQuack Andrew
>> <b'rissed>
>> Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry (
>> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/6ZoE95d-VKc/m/14vVZoyOBgAJ
>> ) and hope you, Michael, also have a healthy appetite too.
>> So how are you ?
>> He's told you a HUNDRED times or more that he's 'wonderfully hungry',
>> gook. That's a LIE. Just LOOK at hime:
> https://www.instagram.com/p/Cy3sTCuxtlf/?hl=en
Great picture!

>
> Does that morbidly obese mongoloid look REMOTELY hungry to you, gook?
Mangina, I am wonderfully hungry by the power of HaShem the Holy Ghost.
>
> Quack Quack!
You are the quack here!

You are a Nazi.

As a Nazi, you are, above all else, a craven coward.

You are afraid to compete with others as equals because you know you
can not measure up.

You are afraid of your own inadequacy, so you want to murder your
betters.

You are afraid of the truth, so you want to murder those who would
tell it.

You are afraid of history, so you want to murder the past, to wipe
out the knowledge of the degeneracy, cowardice and failure of National
Socialism.

Finally, you are afraid of the power of educated, informed adults.
Freedom of choice terrifies you… which is why you choose minor children
as sexual partners. You can not interact with competent adults in a
consensually sexual way. You need to be able to impose yourself on a
helpless victim, be it a prepubescent boy, or a patient in a mental
hospital.

That is what you are, a Nazi, and there is nothing polite or honest
about it.

Michael

Michael Ejercito wrote:
> HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> Michael Ejercito wrote:
>>> An eternally (Mark 3:29) fake-KK(QQ)-nymshifter wrote:
>>>
>>>> WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.N. children's agency said on Sunday over
>>>> 13,000 children have been killed in Gaza in Israel's offensive, adding
>>>> many kids were suffering from severe malnutrition and did not "even
>>>> have the energy to cry."
>>
>> This should remind folks that despite the deceased 16yo Markea's small
>> stature and matching weight of 40 lbs, she did not suffer from severe
>> malnutrition as evident by her having the energy to run away multiple
>> times as reported by both DFACS and Police **and** the energy to
>> confess in her diary that she got sick from eating food she found at
>> the bottom of a Walmart dumpster.
>
> Very great point!

I simply wish that GOD had allowed me to meet her beforehand to
"convince it forward" (John 15:12) for her to also say that she's
"wonderfully hungry" (Philippians 4:12) like her mom in order to have
GOD's Help to be like our LORD Jesus (Luke 24:42-3) so that she would
not have been running away from her wonderfully hungry mom & siblings
who were placing their empty plates, which she drew in her drawings
that was mailed to relatives and shown on TV, to be tared on their
food scales before their food could be weighed.

Source:
https://narkive.com/a7NBSh7v.14

>>> Because absolutely ZERO children in Germany and Japan were killed
>>> between 1940 and 1945.../sarc
>>
>> The only godly way to stop the terrible misbehavior of terrorists, who
>> are always and invariably hangry (2 Kings 6:29), is to "convince it
>> forward" (John 15:12) for them to be wonderfully hungry (Philippians
>> 4:12) instead. If they refuse, then it would be right to imprison them
>> for their own safety as well as the safety of others. If they can't
>> because they're eternally (Mark 3:29) condemned as in the example of
>> LoosePeeledQuackIdiot fake-KK(QQ)-nymshifter et al in this thread, we
>> pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that GOD continues to curse (Jeremiah 17:5)
>> them so that they whither away harmlessly as all are witnessing to
>> their wonder and amazement here on USENET
>.
> A firing squad is fine for me.
>
> Of course, the Romans had crucifixion.

Of course, our LORD says to render onto Caesar what belongs to Caesar
the Roman, so instead let's do likewise as our LORD Jesus & I have
done for you, Michael, and http://go.WDJW.net/ConvinceItForward (John
15:12).

On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 18:44:11 -0700, Michael Ejercito
<MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

>HeartDoc Andrew wrote:
>> Michael Ejercito wrote:
>>
>>> https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/03/19/heluva-scotus-choice-there-joe/
>>>
>>> Heluva SCOTUS Choice There, Joe!
>>> MARCH 19, 2024 / JACK MARSHALL
>>>
> <FLUSH NIGGER AND GOOK NONSENSE>
>>
>> Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry (
>> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/6ZoE95d-VKc/m/14vVZoyOBgAJ
>> ) and hope you, Michael, also have a healthy appetite too.
>>
>> So how are you ?
>>
> I am wonderfully hungry!

Markea Blakely-Berry was wonderfully hungry too, gook.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/hungry-doctor-diet-kill-georgia-teenager/story?id=16661077

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iJLojgoZwsw

>
>
> Michael

(Ketanji) 03/20/24 Again ever more cursed by GOD ...

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/euYDQU1X4Fo/m/C4REuDM-AAAJ

(Kentanji) 03/20/24 Again, who's going straight to Hell ...

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.bible.prophecy/c/GxIt29dJjGg/m/-_U-rAY1EQAJ

Quack Andrew B. Chung = SHEIN = Anita = jew paedophile BARRY 'jewface'
> On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:10:47 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito
>> Quack Andrew B. Chung = SHEIN = Anita = jew paedophile BARRY 'jewface'
>>> Does that morbidly obese mongoloid look REMOTELY hungry to you, gook?
>> Mangina, I am wonderfully hungry by the power of HaShem the Holy Ghost.
> LOL! Gook, the supersded jew g-d haShit (Piss Be Upon him) which you
> worship never HAD a Trinity.
Nithing, Christian theology teaches that HaShem is three distinct
Persons- the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost; each Person is fully God.

So I am indeed wonderfully hungry by the power of the Holy Ghost,
who is HaShem.

You are a nithing- homo sapiens by birth, subhuman BY CHOICE. The
key word is CHOICE. You were born with the same human nature as the
rest of us. Your CHOICES made you a nithing.

Bill explains what nithings are.

http://www.israpundit.com/2008/?p=9446

Define and Dehumanize the Enemy: Jihadists as Nithings or Nidings

by Bill Levinson
It is an ancient principle of magic (which modern people recognize as
stories that reflect a society’s culture and psychology) that
knowledge of a person’s real or True Name delivers power over that
person. What it really means is that, if you know the person’s
psychology, you can gain an advantage over him. It is also well known
that the side that controls the language of an argument controls the
argument. As an example, Hamas terrorists and their enablers refer to
Israel’s military as an “occupation force” and terrorisitic violence
against civilians as “resistance.”

We have long sought a single word that strips the enemy of all
humanity, and reduces him to something less than an animal that is
worthy of nothing less than extermination. As far as we know, the
English language contains no such word, although “dreck” (garbage or
refuse) comes close. “Homo sapiens by BIRTH, subhuman by CHOICE”
describes Islamic supremacists perfectly, but it is a phrase and not a
word. We now propose to refer to Islamic supremacists as nithings or
nidings: a Scandinavian word that strips its object of all humanity.
Webster’s dictionary (1913) defines it as “A coward; a dastard; — a
term of utmost opprobrium.”

We remind readers who object to the dehumanization of Islamic
supremacists that those enemies are already attempting to dehumanize
Jews, and to a lesser degree Christians, with images that could have
come directly from Adolf Hitler. As they have chosen to sow the
dragon’s teeth, our position is that they must now reap their rightful
harvest: the complete hatred and loathing of all civilized human
beings.
nithings

Nithing or niding was more than a common insult, because Scandinavian
culture required its subject to fight a duel with the accuser or
become an outlaw: totally devoid of rights, honor, and even
recognition as a human being. Per the Wikipedia entry,

The actual meaning of the adjective argr or ragr [= Anglo-Saxon
earg] was the nature or appearance of effeminacy, especially by
obscene acts. Argr was the worst, most derogatory swearword of all
known to the Norse language. According to Icelandic law, the accused
was expected to kill the accuser at once. …If the accused did not
retort by violent attack yielding either the accuser to take his words
back or the accuser’s death, he was hence proven to be a weak and
cowardly nithing by not retorting accordingly.

A nithing was devoid of all human rights, and he was considered the
enemy of civilized humanity: a perfect depiction of Islamic
supremacists. The word therefore strips the enemy of all humanity, and
degrades him to the status of a wolf or strangler (per Scandinavian
tradition) or a virulent disease like the Black Plague. Black Plague
is a deadly and contagious disease whose vector consists of plague-
carrying rats, while the Green Plague of militant “Islam” is a deadly
and contagious ideology that is spread by bipedal rats: nidings or
nithings, non-humans that raise violent hands to all of civilized
Humanity.

The immediate consequence of being proven a nithing was
outlawing. The outlawed did not have any rights, he was exlex (Latin
for “outside of the legal system”), in Anglo-Saxon utlah, Middle Low
German uutlagh, Old Norse utlagr. Just as feud yielded enmity among
kinships, outlawry yielded enmity of all humanity.[63] …”Yet that is
but one aspect of outlawry. The outlaw is not only expelled from the
kinship, he is also regarded henceforth as an enemy to mankind.”

The actual definition of a nithing is somewhat more involved and
complex, and it gets into sexual perversions and zoomorphical
transformations (Loki’s transformation of himself into a mare to have
sexual intercourse with a stallion, and thus beget Odin’s horse
Sleipner is probably an example), but the following line is pertinent:
“The nithing used its malicious seid magic to destroy anything owned
and made by man, ultimately the human race and Midgard itself[6], due
to its basically unlimited envy, hate, and malice that were nith.”

"Destruction of everything owned and made by Man” (the Palestinians’
destruction of the greenhouses in Gaza comes to mind immediately) and
“unlimited envy, hate, and malice” describe militant “Islam”
perfectly, and further underscore the application of nithing or niding
to describe it. The propensity for mindless destruction also appears
in Orson Scott Card’s Alvin Maker series, in which a supernatural
enemy is known as the Unmaker: a personification of evil that is the
total antithesis of God the Creator.

The Unmaker is the main antagonist in Orson Scott Card’s
alternate history/fantasy series The Tales of Alvin Maker. Never
directly confronted, it is a supernatural force that breaks apart
matter and aims to destroy and consume everything and everyone. …To
make something is to oppose the Unmaker, but a point often made is
that this is futile. By natural law the Unmaker can tear down faster
than any man can build.

This also is an outstanding definition of militant “Islam” or Islamic
supremacy: an ideology that seeks to destroy everything into which it
comes in contact, and with which no reason, negotiation, or compromise
is possible.

In summary, a nithing or niding is the enemy of Civilization, a
subhuman (through its behavioral choices, and emphatically NOT due to
its racial or ethnic origin) monster with total hatred and malice
toward all human industry and arts, and worthy of nothing but
extermination like any virulent disease. This is the word we will now
apply to Islamic supremacists and their enablers, and we encourage
others to do likewise.

(Kentanji) 03/20/24 Again behold ...

Michael Ejercito wrote:
> HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> Michael Ejercito wrote:
>>> An eternally (Mark 3:29) fake-KK(QQ)-nymshifter wrote:
>>>
>>>> WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.N. children's agency said on Sunday over
>>>> 13,000 children have been killed in Gaza in Israel's offensive, adding
>>>> many kids were suffering from severe malnutrition and did not "even
>>>> have the energy to cry."
>>
>> This should remind folks that despite the deceased 16yo Markea's small
>> stature and matching weight of 40 lbs, she did not suffer from severe
>> malnutrition as evident by her having the energy to run away multiple
>> times as reported by both DFACS and Police **and** the energy to
>> confess in her diary that she got sick from eating food she found at
>> the bottom of a Walmart dumpster.
>
> Very great point!

I simply wish that GOD had allowed me to meet her beforehand to
"convince it forward" (John 15:12) for her to also say that she's
"wonderfully hungry" (Philippians 4:12) like her mom in order to have
GOD's Help to be like our LORD Jesus (Luke 24:42-3) so that she would
not have been running away from her wonderfully hungry mom & siblings
who were placing their empty plates, which she drew in her drawings
that was mailed to relatives and shown on TV, to be tared on their
food scales before their food could be weighed.

Source:
https://narkive.com/a7NBSh7v.4

>>> Because absolutely ZERO children in Germany and Japan were killed
>>> between 1940 and 1945.../sarc
>>
>> The only godly way to stop the terrible misbehavior of terrorists, who
>> are always and invariably hangry (2 Kings 6:29), is to "convince it
>> forward" (John 15:12) for them to be wonderfully hungry (Philippians
>> 4:12) instead. If they refuse, then it would be right to imprison them
>> for their own safety as well as the safety of others. If they can't
>> because they're eternally (Mark 3:29) condemned as in the example of
>> LoosePeeledQuackIdiot fake-KK(QQ)-nymshifter et al in this thread, we
>> pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that GOD continues to curse (Jeremiah 17:5)
>> them so that they whither away harmlessly as all are witnessing to
>> their wonder and amazement here on USENET
>.
> A firing squad is fine for me.
>
> Of course, the Romans had crucifixion.

Of course, our LORD says to render onto Caesar what belongs to Caesar
the Roman, so instead let's do likewise as our LORD Jesus & I have
done for you, Michael, and http://go.WDJW.net/ConvinceItForward (John
15:12).

Quack Andrew B. Chung = SHEIN = Anita = jew paedophile BARRY 'jewface'
> On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 11:31:07 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito

>> Quack Andrew B. Chung = SHEIN = Anita = jew paedophile BARRY 'jewface'
>>> LOL! Gook, the supersded jew g-d haShit (Piss Be Upon him) which you
>>> worship never HAD a Trinity.
>> Nithing, Christian theology teaches that HaShem is three distinct
>> Persons- the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost; each Person is fully God.
>> So I am indeed wonderfully hungry by the power of the Holy Ghost,
>> who is HaShem.
> You can't POSSIBLY still be hungry: just LOOK at yourself you fat
> Asiatic turd: https://www.instagram.com/p/Cy3sTCuxtlf/?hl=en
>
> And the Holy Ghost got[sic][SIC!!! LOL] NOTHING to do with any
> susperseded jew g-d, gook.
God can not be superseded.

The following article explains your pathology.

http://archive.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2009/03/11/historys_oldest_hatred/

History's oldest hatred
By Jeff Jacoby
Globe Columnist / March 11, 2009
Email|Print|Single Page||Text size – +

ANTI-SEMITISM is an ancient derangement, the oldest of hatreds, so
it is strange that it lacks a more meaningful name. The misnomer
"anti-Semitism" - a term coined in 1879 by the German agitator Wilhelm
Marr, who wanted a scientific-sounding euphemism for Judenhass, or
Jew-hatred - is particularly inane, since hostility to Jews has never
had anything to do with Semites or being Semitic.

Perhaps there is no good name for a virus as mutable as anti-Semitism.
"The Jews have been objects of hatred in pagan, religious, and secular
societies," write Joseph Telushkin and Dennis Prager in "Why the Jews?,"
their classic study of anti-Semitism. "Fascists have accused them of
being Communists, and Communists have branded them capitalists. Jews who
live in non-Jewish societies have been accused of having dual loyalties,
while Jews who live in the Jewish state have been condemned as
'racists.' Poor Jews are bullied, and rich Jews are resented. Jews have
been branded as both rootless cosmopolitans and ethnic chauvinists. Jews
who assimilate have been called a 'fifth column,' while those who stay
together spark hatred for remaining separate."

There was Jew-hatred before there was Christianity or Islam, before
Nazism or Communism, before Zionism or the Middle East conflict. This
week Jews celebrate the festival of Purim, gathering in synagogues to
read the biblical book of Esther. Set in ancient Persia, it tells of
Haman, a powerful royal adviser who is insulted when the Jewish sage
Mordechai refuses to bow down to him. Haman resolves to wipe out the
empire's Jews and makes the case for genocide in an appeal to the king:

"There is a certain people scattered and dispersed among . . . all the
provinces of your kingdom, and their laws are different from those of
other peoples, and the king's laws they do not keep, so it is of no
benefit for the king to tolerate them. If it please the king, let it be
written that they be destroyed."

When the king agrees, Haman makes plans "to annihilate, to kill and
destroy all the Jews, the young and the elderly, children and women, in
one day . . . and to take their property for plunder."

What drives such bloodlust? Haman's indictment accuses the Jews of
lacking national loyalty, of insinuating themselves throughout the
empire, of flouting the king's law. But the Jews of Persia had done
nothing to justify Haman's murderous anti-Semitism - just as Jews in
later ages did nothing that justified their persecution under the Church
or Islam, or their repression at the hands of Russian czars and Soviet
commissars, or their slaughter by Nazi Germany. When the president of
Iran today calls for the extirpation of the Jewish state, when firebombs
are hurled at synagogues in London and Paris and Chicago, it is not
because Jews deserve to be victimized.

Many Jews are no saints, but the paranoid frenzy that is anti-Semitism
is not explained by what Jews do, but by what they are. They are the
object of anti-Semitism, not its cause. That is why the haters'
rationales can be so wildly inconsistent and their agendas so
contradictory. What do those who vilify Jews as greedy bankers have in
common with those who revile them as fiendish Bolsheviks? Nothing, save
an irrational obsession with Jews.

At one point, Haman lets the mask slip. He boasts to his friends and
family of "the glory of his riches, and the great number of his sons,
and everything in which the king had promoted him and elevated him."
Still, he seethes with rage and frustration: "Yet all this is worthless
to me so long as I see Mordechai the Jew sitting at the king's gate."
That is the unforgivable offense: "Mordechai the Jew" refuses to blend
in, to be just like everyone else. He goes on sitting there -
undigested, unassimilated, and therefore unbearable.

Of course Haman had his ostensible reasons for targeting Jews. So did
Hitler and Arafat, so does Ahmadinejad. Sometimes the anti-Semite
focuses on the Jew's religion, sometimes on his laws and lifestyle,
sometimes on his professional achievements. Under it all, however, it is
the Jew's Jewishness that the anti-Semite cannot abide.

With all their flaws and failings, the Jewish people endure, their role
in history not yet finished. So the world's oldest hatred endures too,
as obsessive and indestructible - and deadly - as ever.
Anita 'Annie' Shein is jew paedophile BARRY SHEIN's dead circumcised jew
mum's profile photo

(Kentanji) 03/21/24 Again behold ...

Michael Ejercito wrote:
> HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> Michael Ejercito wrote:
>>> An eternally (Mark 3:29) fake-KK(QQ)-nymshifter wrote:
>>>
>>>> WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.N. children's agency said on Sunday over
>>>> 13,000 children have been killed in Gaza in Israel's offensive, adding
>>>> many kids were suffering from severe malnutrition and did not "even
>>>> have the energy to cry."
>>
>> This should remind folks that despite the deceased 16yo Markea's small
>> stature and matching weight of 40 lbs, she did not suffer from severe
>> malnutrition as evident by her having the energy to run away multiple
>> times as reported by both DFACS and Police **and** the energy to
>> confess in her diary that she got sick from eating food she found at
>> the bottom of a Walmart dumpster.
>
> Very great point!

I simply wish that GOD had allowed me to meet her beforehand to
"convince it forward" (John 15:12) for her to also say that she's
"wonderfully hungry" (Philippians 4:12) like her mom in order to have
GOD's Help to be like our LORD Jesus (Luke 24:42-3) so that she would
not have been running away from her wonderfully hungry mom & siblings
who were placing their empty plates, which she drew in her drawings
that was mailed to relatives and shown on TV, to be tared on their
food scales before their food could be weighed.

Source:
https://narkive.com/a7NBSh7v.4

>>> Because absolutely ZERO children in Germany and Japan were killed
>>> between 1940 and 1945.../sarc
>>
>> The only godly way to stop the terrible misbehavior of terrorists, who
>> are always and invariably hangry (2 Kings 6:29), is to "convince it
>> forward" (John 15:12) for them to be wonderfully hungry (Philippians
>> 4:12) instead. If they refuse, then it would be right to imprison them
>> for their own safety as well as the safety of others. If they can't
>> because they're eternally (Mark 3:29) condemned as in the example of
>> LoosePeeledQuackIdiot fake-KK(QQ)-nymshifter et al in this thread, we
>> pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that GOD continues to curse (Jeremiah 17:5)
>> them so that they whither away harmlessly as all are witnessing to
>> their wonder and amazement here on USENET
>.
> A firing squad is fine for me.
>
> Of course, the Romans had crucifixion.

Of course, our LORD says to render onto Caesar what belongs to Caesar
the Roman, so instead let's do likewise as our LORD Jesus & I have
done for you, Michael, and http://go.WDJW.net/ConvinceItForward (John
15:12).

(Kentanji) 03/21/24 Again praying w/ Michael here ...

https://narkive.com/dXMZU4qo.8

(Kentanji) 03/21/24 Again, behold ...

Being unkind to "wonderfully hungry" Michael Ejercito is sin ...

.... just as being unkind to "wonderfully hungry" (i.e. longing to eat
at the rich man's table) Lazarus was the rich man's sin that he wanted
Father Abraham to send Lazarus to warn his brothers not to commit.

Just as this sinning against "wonderfully hungry" Lazarus caused the
rich man to lose his salvation despite being a "son of Abraham," we
are in danger of losing our salvation and automatically going to Hell
for being unkind to Michael Ejercito.

Source:
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/JaC_fVym8fA/m/yClWTlaVAAAJ

Quack Andrew B. Chung = SHEIN = Anita = jew paedophile BARRY 'jewface' SHEIN
> On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 00:21:24 -0400, HeartQuack Andrew
>> (Kentanji) 03/21/24 Again, behold ...
>> Being unkind to "wonderfully hungry" Michael Ejercito is sin ...
> Again, behold....it's not sin, gook...it's MITZVAH.
Wrong, for it is most definitely a sin!

Michael

(Kentanji) 03/21/24 AgainX2 praying w/ Michael here ...

https://narkive.com/dXMZU4qo.8

(Kentanji) 03/21/24 AgainX2, behold ...

Being unkind to "wonderfully hungry" Michael Ejercito is sin ...

.... just as being unkind to "wonderfully hungry" (i.e. longing to eat
at the rich man's table) Lazarus was the rich man's sin that he wanted
Father Abraham to send Lazarus to warn his brothers not to commit.

Just as this sinning against "wonderfully hungry" Lazarus caused the
rich man to lose his salvation despite being a "son of Abraham," we
are in danger of losing our salvation and automatically going to Hell
for being unkind to Michael Ejercito.

Source:
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/JaC_fVym8fA/m/yClWTlaVAAAJ

(Kentanji) 03/21/24 AgainX2 behold ...

Michael Ejercito wrote:
> HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> Michael Ejercito wrote:
>>> An eternally (Mark 3:29) fake-KK(QQ)-nymshifter wrote:
>>>
>>>> WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.N. children's agency said on Sunday over
>>>> 13,000 children have been killed in Gaza in Israel's offensive, adding
>>>> many kids were suffering from severe malnutrition and did not "even
>>>> have the energy to cry."
>>
>> This should remind folks that despite the deceased 16yo Markea's small
>> stature and matching weight of 40 lbs, she did not suffer from severe
>> malnutrition as evident by her having the energy to run away multiple
>> times as reported by both DFACS and Police **and** the energy to
>> confess in her diary that she got sick from eating food she found at
>> the bottom of a Walmart dumpster.
>
> Very great point!

I simply wish that GOD had allowed me to meet her beforehand to
"convince it forward" (John 15:12) for her to also say that she's
"wonderfully hungry" (Philippians 4:12) like her mom in order to have
GOD's Help to be like our LORD Jesus (Luke 24:42-3) so that she would
not have been running away from her wonderfully hungry mom & siblings
who were placing their empty plates, which she drew in her drawings
that was mailed to relatives and shown on TV, to be tared on their
food scales before their food could be weighed.

Source:
https://narkive.com/a7NBSh7v.4

>>> Because absolutely ZERO children in Germany and Japan were killed
>>> between 1940 and 1945.../sarc
>>
>> The only godly way to stop the terrible misbehavior of terrorists, who
>> are always and invariably hangry (2 Kings 6:29), is to "convince it
>> forward" (John 15:12) for them to be wonderfully hungry (Philippians
>> 4:12) instead. If they refuse, then it would be right to imprison them
>> for their own safety as well as the safety of others. If they can't
>> because they're eternally (Mark 3:29) condemned as in the example of
>> LoosePeeledQuackIdiot fake-KK(QQ)-nymshifter et al in this thread, we
>> pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that GOD continues to curse (Jeremiah 17:5)
>> them so that they whither away harmlessly as all are witnessing to
>> their wonder and amazement here on USENET
>.
> A firing squad is fine for me.
>
> Of course, the Romans had crucifixion.

Of course, our LORD says to render onto Caesar what belongs to Caesar
the Roman, so instead let's do likewise as our LORD Jesus & I have
done for you, Michael, and http://go.WDJW.net/ConvinceItForward (John
15:12).

On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 23:17:22 -0400, Loose Cannon <efberg73@gmx.com>
wrote:

>On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 18:44:11 -0700, Michael Ejercito
><MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:
>
>>HeartDoc Andrew wrote:
>>> Michael Ejercito wrote:
>>>
>>>> https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/03/19/heluva-scotus-choice-there-joe/
>>>>
>>>> Heluva SCOTUS Choice There, Joe!
>>>> MARCH 19, 2024 / JACK MARSHALL
>>>>
>> <FLUSH NIGGER AND GOOK NONSENSE>
>>>
>>> Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry (
>>> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/6ZoE95d-VKc/m/14vVZoyOBgAJ
>>> ) and hope you, Michael, also have a healthy appetite too.
>>>
>>> So how are you ?
>>>
>> I am wonderfully hungry!
>
>
>Markea Blakely-Berry was wonderfully hungry too, gook.
>
>https://abcnews.go.com/US/hungry-doctor-diet-kill-georgia-teenager/story?id=16661077
>
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iJLojgoZwsw
>
>>
>> Michael

(Ketanji) 03/27/24 Again ever more cursed by GOD ...

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/euYDQU1X4Fo/m/C4REuDM-AAAJ

HeartDoc Andrew wrote:
> (Ketanji) 03/27/24 Again ever more cursed by GOD ...
>
> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/euYDQU1X4Fo/m/C4REuDM-AAAJ
>
This is tragic!

Michael